Until
the ANC’s Mangaung conference, the debate over nationalisation had dominated
economic policy for two years. Ever since the infamous incident at the ANC’s
2010 economic policy conference when Malema stormed the podium forcing the
issue of nationalisation back onto the agenda against the will of a leadership.
Then they still deferred to the authority that the ANC Youth League’s president
had derived from his role in ousting Mbeki and elevating Zuma into office.
Alarmed by this development capital, at home and abroad, exerted relentless
pressure on the Zuma administration demanding “policy certainty”.
The Mangaung conference’s
rejection of nationalisation could not have been more emphatic than the
decision to expunge the word ‘nationalisation’ itself from the documents
adopted. Unable to face down Malema, who had promoted nationalisation as an
“economic freedom campaign”, the leadership fell back on the tactic of playing
it long. Nationalisation was to be considered after a wide ranging study of its
effectiveness as an economic policy by undertaking study tours to a number of
countries. Now that this farcical world
tour has ended, all pretence has been abandoned. The capitalists have the
certainty they have been demanding.
![]() |
alternative party, for emancipation of the working class and poor majority |
But if under Mbeki the ANC went
onto its knees in front of the capitalist class with the adoption of GEAR and
its attendant offensive against the working class, under Zuma the ANC has gone
onto its belly in front of its big business masters at home and abroad with its
complete abandonment of nationalisation. In so doing Zuma has ripped the heart
out of the Freedom Charter, the implementation of whose promises are impossible
without the state taking control of the commanding heights of the economy.
Like bullets from a double
barrelled shot gun, the rejection of nationalisation was directed
simultaneously at two targets. On the one hand the vanishingly small number on
the anti-capitalist left who believe that the ANC is still contested terrain
for the struggle to determine its class character and its economic policies. On
the other, the radical pro-capitalist nationalists, led by Malema, who had
forced the party to expend a considerable amount of intellectual energy and
resources on debating the matter. All doubt that the ANC is a party of capital
has now been obliterated.
Just how spineless and
intellectually cowardly this decision was is demonstrated by the fact that the
very imperialist masters whose boots they are licking have had no qualms about
resorting to nationalisation as a policy response to the worst economic crisis
capitalism has faced since the Great Depression of the 1930s. To save the
capitalist system, governments in the US, Britain, Spain and elsewhere have
nationalised companies for economic, social and/or political reasons especially
financial institutions whose collapse would have triggered a systemic crisis
for capitalism even worse than the one it is currently experiencing.
Lulled to sleep by their own
propaganda – that sound economic management has enabled SA to survive the world
economic crisis – the ANC leadership has in effect handcuffed itself precisely
at a time when drastic state-driven measures will be needed to avert the coming
catastrophe in the SA economy.
Yet even aside from the direct
impact of the global economic crisis, the necessity for exerting control over
the blind forces of the capitalist market has long been a dire necessity in SA
without which the economy could not have developed to the extent it has. In the
course of its development, capitalism in SA, in an early demonstration of its
effete, belated character, had to rely on the state and nationalisation to
develop the railway network, the electricity grid, the iron and steel industry,
the telecommunications network, the post office, and the petroleum-producing
capability etc. Although the GEAR-inspired fire sale failed (with only Iscor
falling outright into private hands) the management of state-owned-enterprises
on a commercial basis has wreaked significant damage on the economy piling up
the contradictions that ultimately will only be resolved by state intervention
on a socialist basis.
The lessons for those dreamers in
Cosatu who imagine a non-existent past when the ANC was supposed to have been
rooted in the working class, the lesson of Mangaung is clear: the ANC has
returned its ideology and economic policy to its capitalist roots, aligning it
with the policy it has been implementing ever since it came to power. All else
– the RDP, the Freedom Charter - was
mere left-wing flirtation, flattering the working class to deceive it. The
radical Freedom Charter especially, even without the word socialism anywhere in
the text, was ideological seduction, nothing more, in its nationalisation
clauses, which survived a fierce contestation, merely to appease working class
delegates at the Congress of the People where it was adopted.
As Nelson Mandela made clear
following the adoption of the Freedom Charter, in his article “In Our Lifetime”
published in Liberation in 1956 – barely a year after the Freedom Charter was
adopted, the ANC leadership’s interest in nationalisation was never to create a
socialist society, which he understood correctly to mean ownership of the commanding heights of the
economy by a workers state where production would be for use not profit, but
“to open up fresh fields for the development of a prosperous non-European
bourgeois class ...for the first time in
their history the non-European bourgeoisie will have the opportunity to own in
their own name and right mines and factories, and ...private enterprise will
boom and flourish as never before.”
The ANC leadership’s abandoned
interest in nationalisation was only ever for the purposes of creating a black
capitalist class. The policy of Black Economic Empowerment, in other words, is
the practical expression of the aspirations of the black middle class as
expounded by Mandela. BEE is the Freedom Charter of the aspirant black
bourgeoisie. As former ANC spokesperson, Smuts Ngonyama so crudely expressed
when explaining his acquisition of shares from Telkom turning him into a
millionaire overnight, “I did not struggle to be poor.”
The founding of WASP has brought
onto the political stage, a party that apart from being based on the working
class, the only class in society with an interest in, and the capacity to bring
about the overthrow of capitalism and the socialist transformation of society,
a true champions of socialism; a party that will place on the agenda a
programme for the eradication of mass unemployment, poverty, disease,
illiteracy, homelessness, environmental degradation, oppression and
discrimination based on gender, race, religion or nationality.
Such an agenda can be achieved by
the establishment of a workers state which will place the commanding heights of
the economy under the democratic control and management of the working class,
to develop a democratic plan to utilise society’s productive capacity to
provide prosperity for all. Under capitalism, the bosses and their governments
have, with the use of nationalisation, have in fact engaged in theft, stealing
a page from the future socialist society as Frederich Engels, the great
collaborator of Karl Marx, put it. WASP will implement the whole book.
First published on Friday, 01 March
2013 18:02 by Izwi La Basebenzi
No comments:
Post a Comment